When words matter: How anti-immigration rhetoric inspired the El Paso attack
- Examining over 100,000 articles on the El Paso attack, only 37% associated the attack or attacker to terrorism.
- Between Saturday, August 3 and Monday, August 5, articles that mentioned Patrick Crusius by name were three times more likely to link the attack to terrorism than those that did not.
- The media started labelling the attack as an act of terror more frequently after the authorities characterised it as “domestic terrorism”.
- Donald Trump’s anti-immigration rhetoric, and the media reporting of it, increased massively during the two months prior to the attack. There was a total increase of 135% from May to July.
Since the beginning of the year to August 2019, there have been 11 mass-shootings in the U.S. costing the lives of 71 people and leaving 92 more injured. Two of these shootings were committed by white supremacists. The first, on April 27, was at Poway synagogue in California, and the most recent one in El Paso, Texas.
Minutes before massacring 23 people in a shopping centre, Patrick Crusius uploaded a manifesto full of hatred. Crusius labelled Latinx people as “invaders”. His aim and motives were clear; to stop the “invaders” and “defend my country”. He believed that immigration was “detrimental to the future of America.”
Crusius’ manifesto has already been compared to, and seemingly mirrors, views of leading right-wing voices like President Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson. These are public-facing people that have used terms from anti-immigration rhetoric, such as “invasion”, “invaders”, “illegal aliens”, “undocumented immigrants” freely in the past. 
Figure 1. Compiled by Brandon Friedman, connecting the views of conservative opinion leaders, anti-immigration rhetoric, and Crusius’ manifesto.
Patrick Crusius’ crimes have been called “domestic terrorism” by both local and national authorities in the US. Nevertheless, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Crusius will face charges of terrorism in court. Recently, James Alex Fields Jr., the white supremacist that drove his car into protesters at Charlottesville, was charged with murder and hate crimes, and not as a terrorist. 
Below is a statistical analysis of over 100,000 news items published following the attack in El Paso. It examines how often terms like “terrorism” and “terrorist” are used to describe the shooting and Patrick Crusius respectively. It shows that the media’s use of these terms is directly influenced by prominent figures’ usage of them and anti-immigration rhetoric. Further, we show that news items that refer to Crusius by name are more likely to link him, and his act, to terrorism. Finally, we examine how Trump’s anti-immigration rhetoric increased in the months leading up to this attack.
Use of the term terrorist
Our previous research has shown that the media doesn’t use language equally when describing acts of terror committed by white supremacists compared to acts committed by Islamists. Accordingly, we expect that when reporting on El Paso the media will have been unlikely to link the attack to terrorism. 
Globally, there were 103,464 articles reporting on the attack, from Saturday, August 3, to Monday, August 5. We also compared global media to four more refined reading lists (from news organisations with greater reach) as part of this project (see Appendix). In these four lists there were 9,962 articles mentioning the attack.
Figure 2. Total coverage of the El Paso attack (Full Reading List).
Of these, only 37,829 articles included at least one of the terms “terrorist”, “terrorism”, or “terror”. Respectively in the four reading lists used for the same time period there were 3,995 articles (40%) that used at least one of the terms “terrorist”, “terrorism” or “terror”.
This means that only 37% of the total articles used one of the aforementioned terms. In our prior study, we found that in the aftermath of six different white supremacist terrorist attacks, only 24.6% of coverage used these terms. By comparison, 67.6% of the media coverage following the Christchurch shooting used these terms. Whilst the media’s response to El Paso seems to be an improvement from the norm, it does appear to be a step backwards after Christchurch. 
Figure 3. Number of articles reporting on the attack over time (hourly), each line represents the coverage including and excluding the terms “terrorist”, “terrorism” or “terror”.
Figure 3 compares the number of articles relating the attack to terrorism (the red line) to those that did not (the blue line).
What is apparent from the graph is that there was a delay between the initial reporting on the attack and the moment that the media began to label it as an act of terror. This will be analysed in the following section.
Saturday, August 3 (The day of the attack)
On the day of the attack (03/08), only 19% of articles reporting on the attack labelled it as an act of terrorism. This is an average of all the articles from all the reading lists used in this project, that adopted at least one of the terms “terrorism”, “terrorist”, “terror”. In the hours immediately following the attack the media was reluctant to class it as a terrorist act.
In articles that did not name the attacker, this figure dropped as low as 6.9%. On the other hand, in articles that refer to Patrick Crusius by name this percentage jumps up to 31.3%. The reason for this is unclear, but it does suggest that the media were more prepared to connect the attacker to terrorism than the mass shooting itself.
Figure 4. Coverage of the attack, numbers and percentages of articles labelling it as an act of terrorism (03/08), divided into the four reading list that were used for this project. Green is marking the highest percentage and red the lowest.
Sunday, August 4
Sunday marked a turning point in the media to characterising the attack as an act of terrorism.
The media used the terms “terrorist”, “terrorism” or “terror” more than twice as frequently than on Saturday, August 3 (from 19% to 42.8%). Early in the day the authorities announced that they were treating the case as “domestic terrorism” (see figure 3).  From this moment onwards the media began to use the aforementioned terms more readily.
As was the case with the Christchurch attack , the media followed the example of the authorities in naming the event as an act of terrorism. The attack in El Paso further adds to our conclusion that “influential figures may have the ability to shift the narrative around events and topics.”
Interestingly, we see the same trends continuing as the narrative develops. Even as media classification of the shooting as terrorism increased, media about the attack was still 49.9% more likely to describe it as terrorism when Crusius was named than when he remained nameless (35.8%).
Figure 5. Coverage of the attack, numbers and percentages of articles labelling it as an act of terrorism (04/08), divided into the four reading lists that were used for this project. Green is the highest percentage and red the lowest.
Monday, August 5
On Monday, the upward trend continued. More than half (53.2%) of the articles referred to the attack as terrorism. One might attribute this further rise to Trump’s condemnation of white supremacy and racism early on Monday. 
Once again, we see that articles that mentioned Crusius by name more readily link the attack to terrorism. Over 65% of articles that name Crusuis linked the attack to terrorism, compared to 41% in articles that did not.
Figure 6. Coverage of the attack, numbers and percentages of articles labelling it as a terrorism act (05/08), divided into the four reading lists that were used for this project. Green is the highest percentage and red the lowest.
The Trump effect
In the aftermath of the attack, there has been a lot of discussion around whether Trump “fuelled” or “provoked” this attack or the attacker. Many have claimed that his rhetoric and comments on immigration, have encouraged far-right extremism.  People have pointed, in particular, to Trump’s response to one of his supporters shouting “shoot them”, in reference to immigrants, during one of his rallies in Florida last May. 
We looked at how often both Trump and hostile language about immigrants appeared together in global media. During the last three months, Trump’s anti-immigration rhetoric, and news reporting on it, has risen dramatically. In June, Trump appeared, in relation to offensive language towards immigrants, in 34,152 articles globally, an increase of 167% from May.
This trend fell slightly, by 11.8%, throughout. Nevertheless, in comparison to April, anti-immigration rhetoric appeared four times more often in July.
Figure 7. Number of articles and figures of increase of articles mentioning Donald Trump in association with terms “illegal immigrant(s)” “illegal alien(s)”, “immigrant invasion”, “undocumented immigrant(s)”.
News pieces that linked Trump to anti-immigration rhetoric increased drastically in both June and July (see below – Figure 7). This massive spike in Trump’s anti-immigration rhetoric and media coverage of it is clearly depicted in Figure 7.
This graph shows the volume of articles, mentioning Trump alongside one of the following terms: “illegal (im)migrant(s)” “illegal alien(s)”, “(im)migrant(s) invasion”. Throughout the year, a previous significant spike occurred during January – 20,132 articles. By comparison, June and July saw 34,152 and 10,104 articles respectively, a massive increase.
Figure 8. Volume of articles mentioning Donald Trump in association with terms “illegal (im)migrant(s)” “illegal alien(s)”, “(im)migrant(s) invasion”.
The media seemed unwilling to label this attack as terrorism, especially before the authorities announced that they were treating it as a case of “domestic terrorism”. This further adds to our belief that prominent figures bear a responsibility in correctly labelling terrorism.
An unexpected finding from this study was that the media are more likely to refer to an attack as “terrorism” in articles in which they use the attackers name. On average, between Saturday, August 3 and Monday, August 5, 48.8% of the articles mentioning Crusius used a term that linked the attack to terrorism. In comparison, articles which did not name Crusius only did this on average 28% of the time.
Our data shows that Trump’s anti-immigration rhetoric spiked massively during the last two months. The El Paso manifesto echoed a vocabulary that Trump (amongst other public and political figures) spouted increasingly in June and July. Whilst we cannot directly conclude that Trump triggered this attack, it is worth considering whether it would have occurred without his vocal anti-immigration stance.
Lean Right Sources:
Lean Left Sources:
|ABC News (USA)||Mediaite||The Advocate-Messenger|
|Atlanta Journal-Constitution||Miami Herald||The Atlantic|
|Austin American-Statesman||Michigan Daily||The Centre View|
|Boston Globe||MTV||The Commercial Appeal|
|Bustle||NBC News||The Economist|
|BuzzFeed||NBC News: Today||The Guardian|
|CBS News||Newsweek||The Independent|
|Chicago Sun-Times||Pacific Standard||The New York Times|
|CNN||Philadelphia Inquirer||The Root|
|Counter Currents||Politico||The Spokesman-Review|
|Daily News (Bowling Green, Kentucky)||Politifact||The Verge|
|Daily Northwestern||Public Integrity||TIME Magazine|
|Daily Targum||Sacramento Bee||US News & World Report|
|Daily Times-Call (Longmont Colorado)||San Jose Mercury News (California)||Vanity Fair|
|Grist||Sky-Hi Daily News||VTDigger|
|Las Vegas Sun||State Journal||Washington Post|
|Los Angeles Times||Teen Vogue|
|Louisville Courier-Journal||Texas Observer|
Top 50 Global Sources:
|Axios||International Business||Russia Today|
|BBC||Irish Times||South China Morning Post|
|Boston Globe||Jyllands Posten||Sydney Morning Herald|
|Business Insider||Le Monde||The Daily Telegraph|
|BusinessWeek||Los Angeles Times||The Economist|
|CBS News||Melbourne Age||The Guardian|
|China Daily||MIT Technology Review||The Independent|
|Financial Times||Nature||The Times|
|Forbes||NBC News||The Wall Street Journal|
|Global Capital||New Scientist||TIME|
|Handelsblatt||New York Times||USA Today|
|Harvard Business Review||PBS||Washington Post|
US Tier One Sources:
ABC News (USA)
AP Associated Press
Arizona Daily Star
Bloomberg Law – Big Law Business
Bloomberg New Energy Finance
Bloomberg Sports News
Bloomberg: Surveillance Show
Business Insider US
CBS Evening News
Cincinnati Business Courier (Ohio)
Crain’s Chicago Business
Dallas Morning News
Defense Industry Daily
Denver – The Huffington Post
Detroit Free Press
Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy Review
Dow Jones DBR Small Cap Alert
Dow Jones Financial Information Services
Dow Jones Industrial Stocks (DJIA)
Dow Jones Institutional News
|Field & Stream
Fort Worth Business Press (TX)
Fox News Latino
Grand Forks Herald (North Dakota)
Herald-Times (Bloomington, Indiana)
Hot Springs Sentinel-Record
Huffington Post (USA)
International New York Times
Las Vegas Review Journal
Las Vegas Sun
latimes.com – Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles – The Huffington Post
Los Angeles Times
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Mississippi River Clean-Up
MSN Video USA
New York – The Huffington Post
New York Daily News
New York Post
New York Post (NY)
New York Times
New York Times (Abstracts) (NY)
Northern Wyoming Daily News
Philadelphia Daily News
Philadelphia Inquirer (PA)
Philadelphia Inquirer/Daily News, The (PA)
Pittsburgh Tribune Review
San Francisco Business Times
San Francisco Chronicle
San Francisco Examiner
Saugus Advertiser (Massachusetts)
Silicon Valley Business Journal (California)
Sonoma West Times and News
St. Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)
Technology – Los Angeles Times
Technology Blog on The Huffington Post
The Alestle: Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville
The Atlanta Technology Journal
The Beaumont Enterprise (Texas)
The Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield, Massachusetts)
The Boston Globe
The Dallas Morning News: Blogs
The Detroit News (Michigan)
The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
The Hillsdale Daily News (Michigan)
The Houston Chronicle
The Huffington Post
The Kansas City Star
The New York Times
The Newtown Bee (Connecticut)
The Nightly Business Report
The Wall Street Journal
Times – Picayune (New Orleans)
Times Herald (Port Huron, Michigan)
U.S. Fed News
Wall Street Journal
Washington Business Journal
Yahoo! Finance USA
Image source: President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump meet with law enforcement personnel Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2019, at the El Paso Emergency Operations Center in El Paso, Texas (Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks).